I have been noting which photographs tend to create a response and those that don't.
The irony is that the photographs that I truly, madly and deeply love, are not the same as the ones that y'all love. I suppose the quick answer to that is: different strokes, different folks.
Rumour has it I have a meeting in rosebank at 7pm --- I say lets get Crunk'd (before and after)
*thirsty, very thirsty!
Nov 2007
Observation: Your pictures have been taking a tinge of darkness, not in the metaphorical sense, as in literally. Even day time looks bleak.
Comment: Has "raw" got you by its talons?
Nov 2007
what are talons?
Nov 2007
mad dope/ill/crazy/sick/tight.
Nov 2007
spiritual
Nov 2007
talons: is RAW were an eagle, you would be its prey. A slave to RAW. Think The Exorcist.
Nov 2007
hmm,,, then that means I can't answer dukes question. Cause if RAW was an eagle, then all inanimate objects would be animate.
RAW cannot be an eagle. The 'darkness tinge' maybe, that might have 'got me by it's talons'.
Nov 2007
!Dig'it...
Nov 2007
WooooWWW....this is amazing...
lovely indeeed!!